/tech/ - Soyence and Technology

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Options	Poster IDs Images Only
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (652.58 KB, 1920x1080) ImgOps

Chud 04/23/25 (Wed) 07:40:42 №10123 [Reply]

archGODS won

Chud 04/23/25 (Wed) 09:10:05 №10146

>>10123 (OP)
Nix is better tho

Chud 04/24/25 (Thu) 11:16:20 №10673

>>10146
Nobody has enough free time to learn Nix outside of Neets.

Chud 04/24/25 (Thu) 11:30:26 №10688

File: lockingthisinsanethread.png 📥︎ (59.65 KB, 1015x249) ImgOps

>artix bad eve&doe the devs are keyed

Chud 04/24/25 (Thu) 15:48:55 №10799

>>10688
very based indeed, artixchads won

Chud 04/24/25 (Thu) 17:19:08 №10836

why use fartix or arch when there is void

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:36:16 №11218

>>10836
this

File: 1740938753174k.png 📥︎ (434.57 KB, 1920x1080) ImgOps

Question to daily-driver fartix users Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 00:33:50 №4399 [Reply]

Just considering trying your distro on my main desktop. Are there any problems with aur packages? Fartix repo has about 2 times lower amount of them, and I'm not sure it would work long-term without broken updates with aur repo, with their systemd compatibility layer.

Is there anyone who's using it for a long time here? How it is? Arch is stable btw.

11 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 11:43:06 №4428

>>4427
Just why? If you have been using artix for a year o algo, there is no particular reason to switch to just riced arch fork like garuda, geg. I use arch btw for a long time, and I would never even consider an option to switch to something like archcraft or endeavour.

Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 11:55:41 №4429

>>4428
The reason why was because I was lazy and the specific software I needed forced me to switch due to it's hard systemd requirement, but now that the software in question actually works on Artix there's no reason for me to stay on any systemd distro. Sure I could've just installed stock Arch and followed the manual, but it is nice when everything is done automatically for you when you don't have time in that given moment to CLi install a distro yourself. Garuda filled what I needed at the time, a immediately deployable distro with lots of creature comforts that actually applied to me (gaming, lots of software good software pre-configred, etc) while being a good lazy fix to issues specific to my hardware. But now that the issue is resolved on Artix I can switch back and just carve out the time to manually bring all those creature comforts onto Artix myself. To Garudas credit, it's pre-configs makes it a step-above most Arch based distros (especially if it's a high-end machine with pretty new hardware) and I'd argue it's pretty good for getting newbies into Arch before they go balls deep into stock Arch or Artix. It's not just some riced out clone, it's the only good thing to come out of India lol.

Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 12:13:46 №4431

>>4429
I never said that arch-based distros are bad, they're perfect for normies. But here we're talking about freedom, you know, and arch is delivering it to you, while artix offering even more choice. Artix hasn't any advantages on arch, besides additional freedom to choose init system, while it has a huge cons like a much smaller community. Rice from scratch is a huge part of freedom, without it and 5 gb of bloatware (timing post btw >>4425) it's not more about your ownership of this system. So if you don't care about freedom, why you've been using fartix instead of arch? It doesn't have any sense lolll

Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 13:51:39 №4434

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (60.49 KB, 1388x271) ImgOps

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (34.21 KB, 614x453) ImgOps

>>4431
Enjoy your tranny OS!

Chud 03/14/25 (Fri) 14:02:34 №4436

>>4431
>I never said that arch-based distros are bad
Never said you did, I am just saying Garuda isn't just some riced out fork and actually has some value to the distro.

>Why use Artix if you are compromising
Because again, due to my hardware I was FORCED to compromise. At the time of me using Artix I couldn't get things like rog-control-center or asusctl and have them play nice but now they do, which is why I am probably going to switch back soon. I do care about freedom but outside of the init system issues I am not getting more or less freedom on something like Garuda. I can still rice it the same as I did on Arch or Artix just fine, everything else outside of the convenient configs were standard (and a lot of the configs are stuff I would apply myself so I didn't mind, maybe in a cleaner way), etc. And while yes Artix has a smaller community, since it's so close to Arch minus init system freedom it doesn't need a huge one because outside of documentation on the wiki and forums about systems, all other information applies which is why Artix is a very neat and versatile distro. It rides the benefits of all the leg work done on Arch over the years and improves upon it while maintaining compatibility.

At the end of the day if you have hardware that can't be utilized on the OS you currently use, wouldn't you be willing change to another option EVEN IF it meant compromising on some of your freedom? And keep in mind, this isn't trivial hardware that doesn't effect your day-to-day, I am talking about stuff like charge-limiting so you don't wear out your battery or the ability to use your GPU fans correctly. Without a compromise best case scenario you are going to have hardware issues making your machine not function well, and worse case scenario for some people, though rare, your machine doesn't really work at all.

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:33:26 №11215

%%>Just considering trying your distro on my main desktop. Are there any problems with aur packages? Fartix repo has about 2 times lower amount of them, and I'm not sure it would work long-term without broken updates with aur repo, with their systemd compatibility layer.
%%>
%%>Is there anyone who's using it for a long time here? How it is? Arch is stable btw.

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (528.12 KB, 1280x683) ImgOps

I just invented a new number Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 13:41:27 №7903 [Reply]

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 17:50:40 №8188

>>7971
wtf

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 19:50:23 №8381

'teens how do I invent a new number

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 05:56:01 №8797

someone please verify if thats true

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 12:01:59 №8984

>>8797
i just did. that 'teen may win the fields medal. total soyteen victory

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:25:42 №11211

>>8381
you just do

Chud 04/27/25 (Sun) 09:28:27 №11637

Related:
>>8918 (OP)
>>9609 (OP)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (481.88 KB, 1170x1039) ImgOps

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 16:04:11 №8028 [Reply]

interesting…

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 16:06:28 №8030

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (255.92 KB, 541x707) ImgOps

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 05:50:03 №8790

so only blacks benefitted by being around whites

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 13:53:10 №9039

>>8028 (OP)
HOW CAN THIS BE??????????????

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:22:48 №11207

>>8028 (OP)
>>8030
how could science say that

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (150.93 KB, 226x300) ImgOps

0/0 is 0 Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 07:32:32 №7707 [Reply]

I have yet to see a contradiction of this, can you disprove it without using limits or the words "ring" or "structure", chud

16 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 18:47:02 №9175

any number divided by itself gives 1, e.g. 5/5=1
zero divided by any number gives 0, e.g. 0/5=0
given the above, the result of 0/0 is both 1 and 0, therefore it's undefined
qrd

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 19:05:30 №9188

Mathematician here. I don't know why I'm wasting my time on this raisinhole, but here is a rigorous explanation for why 0/0 is undefined.

When constructing a number system in higher mathematics, division is actually defined in terms of multiplicative inverses. For any number a, we define the multiplicative inverse of a, written a^-1, as the number such that a * a^-1 = a^-1 * a = 1, where 1 is the multiplicative identity. Then dividing a by b, or in other terms a/b, is actually equal to a * b^-1. So division is just a form of multiplication.

Then in order to divide by 0, we would need to find the multiplicative inverse of 0. But if that number existed, then 0 * 0^-1 = 1, and since the left hand side must be 0 we have 0 = 1, meaning our ring only has one element, making it the trivial ring.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 19:07:37 №9190

>>9188
please explain >>8016
what are wheels used for in math

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 19:14:08 №9196

>>9190
I've never heard of it before now and a quick look seems to reveal it's never been used for anything useful. Basically just a meme invented by one guy.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 19:43:06 №9216

>>9196
I wonder if there may be something which is more naturally considered, say, a wheel module. It seems to just be the generalization of the extended real line to commutative rings (though with no difference between -infty and +infty) but I also don't know of any interesting algebraic theory of the extended real line which is not inherited from just R.

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:21:53 №11205

>>7845
mathcel cope

File: 1518142692917.png 📥︎ (97.32 KB, 477x479) ImgOps

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:04:35 №9585 [Reply]

We imagine a point‐source emitter racing around a perfect circle of radius R at just the right speed that each 2πR loop equals an integer multiple of the wavelength. On every revolution it fires off an isotropic pulse, so that its own echo arrives in phase on the next pass. What wave‑pattern builds up at the very center, and what interference or scattering signature emerges out beyond the ring?

Deep inside (r<R) you’d expect a nondiffracting, Bessel‑beam–style hotspot whose radial profile J_0(kr) superposes contributions from infinitely many turns. Could this be framed as a bound‑state problem for the 2D Helmholtz operator on a disk, invoking spectral zeta functions or even a Selberg‐trace analogue for periodic orbits? Outside (r>R), the field fans out into outgoing Hankel modes H_m^(1)(kr) with m‑dependent phase shifts that one could package into an S‑matrix; do resonant poles appear in the complex‑k plane, hinting at quasi‑bound whispering‑gallery states or Floquet resonances from the time‐periodic source?

What if we push the emitter to relativistic speeds and ask how time dilation and aberration warp the echoes. Could frame dragging in a Kerr analogy or superradiant amplification show up? If the loop encloses a synthetic gauge flux, might the wave pick up a Berry phase à la Aharonov–Bohm? Introduce a weak Kerr nonlinearity and do modulational instabilities spawn ring solitons, or could quantum field quantization reveal photon‐revival phenomena back at r = 0? Is there a Poisson‐summation duality bridging the sum over revolutions to a lattice of virtual sources in space? Numerical boundary‐element or steepest‐descent analyses for large kR could illuminate caustics and far‐field fringes, while abstract Floquet theory hints at topological band structures in the angular domain.

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:17:49 №11204

up, i want a chud to answer this

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (105.28 KB, 225x225) ImgOps

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 18:27:40 №8247 [Reply]

this might sound retarded, but why does (Newtonian) gravity behave the way it does? why don’t objects with more mass have more acceleration? doesn’t it intuitively make more sense for earth to exert the same force on all objects instead of the force adjusting based on an object’s mass?
it’s like when a person has to manually apply more force to be able to pick up something heavy, and that person is a rock
and here’s where i get stuck: gravity’s law says F = G·M·m/r², so the bigger the object (m), the bigger the force. yet when you divide by the same m (F = m·a), the mass cancels and everyone accelerates at the same rate. so earth really is “pulling harder” on heavier things, but those things also “fight back” harder, so they still speed up at 9.8 m/s².
but why should nature be so perfectly balanced? why must the gravitational mass (how strongly you’re pulled) always equal the inertial mass (how much you resist being pulled)? wouldn’t it be simpler if earth grabbed everything equally and light things just zipped off faster?

i know galileo dropped balls off the leaning tower, and einstein made sense of it with spacetime curvature, but it still feels like a cosmic coincidence that gravity scales exactly with mass. is there a deeper reason—or is this “canceling-out” symmetry just one of those brute facts of our universe?

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 21:37:56 №8518

>>8247 (OP)
> know galileo dropped balls off the leaning tower, and einstein made sense of it with spacetime curvature
what is this schizo rewriting of history

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 12:51:23 №9009

>>8247 (OP)
holy raisin retard learn to put things in fewer words please you're just babbling in circles

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 17:31:43 №9152

>>8247 (OP)
>Why?
It is what happens, the theories are trying to explain stuff
that happens. These things do not "think", stop thinking they do.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 19:43:22 №9218

>>8247 (OP)
>pic
umm, ackshually, the bowling ball would land a bit sooner because it's more massive and therefore pulls the earth towards itself with higher force than the feather does

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 08:54:17 №9578

>>9218
this

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:17:14 №11203

>>8247 (OP)
tl;dr??

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (327.48 KB, 400x400) ImgOps

>12000 RPM refutes Conservation of Angular Momentum Chud 04/18/25 (Fri) 17:19:42 №6549 [Reply]

our response?

17 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 08:05:02 №7720

>>7332
>>7339
what's funny about this schizo is that he hasn't even managed to convince a single person of his "discovery". It's just so obvious to even the most demented flat earther that friction is the reason why his idealized calculations fail in experiment

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 12:46:42 №7847

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdbIHkjnVs
This video just screams insanity. How is this person real?

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 17:57:15 №8203

>>7089
<'ddit space

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 05:46:16 №8784

>>7847
is this guy aussie

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 08:45:55 №9570

so what's the verdict?

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:16:11 №11202

>>7847
doctor here. this is legit schizoohrenia

File: mathematics.jpg 📥︎ (32.24 KB, 982x508) ImgOps

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 08:58:26 №9583 [Reply]

I just figured out a new method to do the 5x table all by myself. So choose any number, add a zero at the end of it, then half it and you get the answer.

Example: 75 x 5. So we add a zero to 75. 750. Half of 750 is 375. So without even checking we know 75 x 5 is 375.

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:14:59 №11201

holy raisin this 'teen just invented new math

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (19.36 KB, 206x161) ImgOps

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 17:30:41 №8160 [Reply]

I'm heckin doing math holy raisin

15 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 05:59:36 №8803

ChatGPT is unironically better at math than 99% of math majors now

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 07:03:30 №8843

>>8803
then aim to be the 1 percent.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 07:04:42 №8847

>>8803
most math majors just become glorified code monkeys working at a bank so this means nothing

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:05:04 №9586

>>8803
bait

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:31:34 №9602

If that's math why are there letters?

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:12:19 №11199

based chud

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (217.37 KB, 927x728) ImgOps

How true is this? Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 18:22:53 №8239 [Reply]

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 19:14:39 №8336

e=mc^2+chud

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 19:24:27 №8347

File: Screenshot_20250402_175827.png 📥︎ (158.06 KB, 460x344) ImgOps

>>8239 (OP)
when a schizo cant even follow basic rules for graphing, how valuable do you think their line of thinking is?

Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 20:49:49 №8451

>>8336
this

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 05:38:16 №8771

>>8347
are you seriously too retarded to read this

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 14:25:07 №9726

It's true. dont ask me why, think about it

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:10:51 №11198

>>8347
projection

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (163.48 KB, 850x726) ImgOps

The universe is a computer Chud 04/20/25 (Sun) 18:13:10 №8224 [Reply]

Let me explain:

First you have to reconcile three things:
1) modal collapse (the consequence of Godels Ontological proof which is another way of saying everything exists necessarily and if it can happen, it will happen).
2) quantum immortality (the consequence being you will personally eventually see the outcome of all of the things you are reading in this thread).
3) the universe rotates around a center of mass per the Godel universe in pic related, and looping timelines are real and possible (pic related)

As the universe expands, long-living advanced organisms only care about one of a handful of things: 1) sharing mathematical constants with each other (Asimov), 2) deciding when to fall into a black hole, 3) killing each other. You as an organism aware of quantum immortality will eventually become one of these entities.

As an object falls into a black hole, it freezes on the event horizon. Because of modal collapse, the chances of something eventually copying and replicating that data somewhere else becomes 100%. As a sentient object, there is no way of you knowing whether you are the real object, or the object being replicated. Because the universe is an engine of copying data and replicating it back out, it is attune to RAM on a computer and opcodes moving around data on a CPU. It is Turing Complete, and subject to the Halting Problem (also seen in our time looping universe).
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

9 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 17:01:35 №9136

>>8903
>>8840
>>8224 (OP)
can a physicschud please explain the significance of this Gödel universe/Gödel metric stuff? So there's a solution to the Einstein field equations that would allow time travel?

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:33:34 №9604

bump

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:50:55 №9618

>>8224 (OP)
>You as an organism aware of quantum immortality will eventually become one of these entities.
Does mean I eventually get an anime gf with huge perfect breasts?

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 12:42:13 №9676

>>8224 (OP)
looking into this

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 14:58:05 №9749

>>8224 (OP)
Maybe read a physics textbook. Your understanding of these topics is rather lacking.

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:07:27 №11195

>>8840
youll get used to it

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (1.94 MB, 1200x675) ImgOps

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 12:48:03 №9006 [Reply]

Why do blacks hate the cold? This is a well none fact by the way. Blacks HATE the cold. In fact, when it is cold out they tend to stay inside and, coincidentally, crime tends to go down in the winter too; crime also goes up, way up, in the summer. Scientifically, what is the reason for this? I want to posit that it has to, scientifically speaking, be related to the ancient spirit (although, we can talk about genes here if you like), which dwelt in the primordial forms of the races in ancient times. Our ancestors seemed to like the cold and the height of white civilization happened during ice ages or periods of cold weather. Could it be that climate change has unresearched racial effects? If we blocked out the sun in order to cool the weather, would that fix the effect and reawaken the ancient spirit?

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 14:30:12 №9731

why is that, please someone tell me

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 14:50:57 №9742

they feel like it

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 15:00:46 №9752

Systemic racism is the reason blacks haven’t figured out layering yet

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 16:15:58 №9788

File: IMG_1824.jpeg 📥︎ (109.14 KB, 544x360) ImgOps

Anon in the beginning Africa was a rainforest jungle. It was super shaded most likely. Hence the growth of the Congo basin. I bet that mug stretched (this is a fact) through out the Sahara desert. (This is not a fact) I bet something deforested the world really fast and super heated it around them dang pyramids. So to assume melanin makes you aggressive in the sun is preposterous because our ancient ancestors like ancient came from the jungle. But I’m black and I enjoy the cold. I think it’s better than the heat. It allows movement to escape instead of shedding my flesh. I think it’s a personal preference that makes people more resilient to cold and to think how to have fun in this bullraisin.
When you’re out there and you’re really living and raisin. It becomes home. The cold makes everyone nicer because it’s like the whole planet trying to kill you. It forces density and forced density forces ideas to spread and exchange. I can’t think of a lot of conspiracy grass roots that took off better than slave revolts. And you’re no greater slave than a slave to this planet.

AHHHHHHH TAKE ME BACK ! I DKNTT EVEN NEED VITAMINS IM OUTSIDE ALL DAY ! TAKE ME BACK !!!!

Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 05:06:56 №11194

>>9788
thanks for the information