№11975[Quote]
>>11955 (OP)Unironically based.
But I get the feeling that they're doing this because Anora won despite being a low budget film about a hooker who shows her boobs off a lot and calls people faggots.
№13358[Quote]
>>11975there were lots of articles about voters refusing to see The Brutalist because it was too long and depressing
№13362[Quote]
>>11955 (OP)I'm astonished this hasn't been a rule from the get-go but it's also something that will be impossible to enforce. Has anyone ever read those Oscar voter cards? Bundles of them say they don't have time to watch movies because they're too busy. They'll just lie and say they watched them.
№13555[Quote]
>>13362imagine being too lazy to read the 2 lines of op before commenting with your dumbass take
№13566[Quote]
>>11955 (OP)Those Emilia Perez voters make a lot more sense now.
№19732[Quote]
zased.
№19749[Quote]
Actually huge. Is Hollywood.. back?
№21722[Quote]
>>11955 (OP)They'll just lie on the forms. From the beginning the joke has been that assistants are the ones that vote for the movies. When you're busy creating movies, you have no time to actually watch new movies. Motion picture peers are perhaps the least qualified to give out awards since they watch so few movies.
№21732[Quote]
>>13555Imagine thinking that those tracking methods aren't not only ridiculously easy tp circumvent but impossible to enforce. Kill yourself, you stupid fuck scumbag.
№22151[Quote]
>>21732average oscar voter age must be 65
they'll just stop voting
№22155[Quote]
Oh no no poor jewerinos would have to watch the entire package of their own propaganda slop before giving trannies the awards for being brave
№23269[Quote]
>Oscars admits films get awards without even being watched.
I am not surprised.
№23270[Quote]
>>13358>Thre and a half hours of jewish bullraisinWhen I watched Bertolucci's 1900 around 2 and half hours I just started zoning out.