Things I DON'T believe in:-Goodel's incompleteness theorem-Special relativity-Second law of thermodynamics-Many worlds interpretation-Conservation of Angular Momentum-Mathematical universe-Cold fusion not workingI could disprove all of them

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (347.48 KB, 800x640) ImgOps

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 12:49:52 №9007 [Quote]

Things I DON'T believe in:
-Goodel's incompleteness theorem
-Special relativity
-Second law of thermodynamics
-Many worlds interpretation
-Conservation of Angular Momentum
-Mathematical universe
-Cold fusion not working
I could disprove all of them for you right now (except for cold fusion not working; that is one that I am not 100% sure of and don't have disproof yet) but I want to put the disproofs together elegantly enough to garner attention and I don't want anyone here to steal credit so you'll just have to be patient (if you don't already know the disproofs yourself)
What are some commonly-accepted scientific beliefs that you disagree with?
As for theories that I kinda disagree with but am open to:
-General relativity

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 14:02:56 №9043 [Quote]

>>9007 (OP)
shut up soyence nigger

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 14:46:21 №9064 [Quote]

>>9007 (OP)
Conservation of Angular Momentum :
Conservation of Energy :

Momentum and Energy are not conserved because Time Symmetry doesn't hold.

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 14:54:34 №9072 [Quote]

>>9007 (OP)
Second LAW of thermodynamics is beyond a fact. It is the LAW of nature.
It’s my first encounter with someone visualizing and creating the concept of number island for me so that’s really cool but I believe that’s beyond true to a very real extent. Zoom out zoom out enchance.
Why would angular momentum stop ? If I was in space and just coasting through the vast empty why would I stop coasting save I didn’t interact with anything. Like if I was ice skating down a hill why would I just magically start going up the hill ? Without reverse thrusters on obviously.
https://youtu.be/LC97wdQOmfI?si=2Bca4p-88Lo4rd55

Chud 04/21/25 (Mon) 15:27:06 №9092 [Quote]

>>9007 (OP)
>-Conservation of Angular Momentum
https://youtu.be/lkRsmjV1mfE

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 09:08:34 №9588 [Quote]

wow op youre so smart

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 12:02:39 №9666 [Quote]

Try to disprove the Mathematical Universe. Just curious to see

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 13:21:00 №9699 [Quote]

File: JS Paint.png 📥︎ (7.24 KB, 683x384) ImgOps

Gödel's incompleteness theorem seems to be pretty much axiomatic - In any consistent formal system F that is expressive enough to encode arithmetic, there exists a statement G such that:

• G is true, but

• G is unprovable within F.

And, if F is consistent, then F dosn't prove Cons(F)
Just put a statement like "this statement is not provable" through some Gödel numbering and it seems clear to me that the result generalises into a irrefutable gap in the capabilites of formal systems. I'd be very excited to see if you have found a flaw in this.

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 13:24:45 №9701 [Quote]

>>9699
it's not just any formal system

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 13:38:41 №9712 [Quote]

File: 1745166714671o.jpeg 📥︎ (800.07 KB, 2817x2902) ImgOps

>>9007 (OP)
I don't only not believe in any of this sh.it but have never heard of that sh.it in the first place

Chud 04/22/25 (Tue) 16:02:10 №9781 [Quote]

>>9699
Can you explain it with a more real world example like the schoddingers cat ? I imagine a world built on a raisinty foundation will still find a way to work out the issue because it’s based on raisinty law also.
1+3+2=1+2+3 =6 =\= 3*2

BUMP Chud 04/25/25 (Fri) 01:36:14 №11124 [Quote]

>>9666
>>9699
BUMPERINO
someone needs to devils advocate this that would be an interesting read.