[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / mtv / dem ] [ int / pol ] [ a / asp / biz / fit / k / r9k / sude / tech / tv / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/tech/ - Soyence and Technology

Download more RAM for your Mac here
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (758.72 KB, 600x600) ImgOps

 â„–8018[Quote]

how can an equation in math have 2 possible solutions?

 â„–8023[Quote]

Parentheses > Exponents > [ Multiplication, Division] [Addition, Subtraction]
Following this, we get 16.
Retard.

 â„–8025[Quote]

>>8023
it clearly says both are equally correct

 â„–8027[Quote]

>>8023
The only way it could ever be 1 is due to notation
Parentheses next to a number implies multiplication, in that case you will get 20/20 = 1
So, just dont be a retard

 â„–8033[Quote]

>>8023
retard, it's
P. 2*2
E. None
M. 5*4
d. 20/20
A. None
S. None
so you see the answer is 1

 â„–8037[Quote]

>>8033
>>>8023 (You)
>retard, it's
>P. 2*2
>E. None
>M. 5*4
>d. 20/20
>A. None
>S. None
>so you see the answer is 1
20 / 5 (2×2) → 20 / 5 (4), now we have to go from left to right
Meaning: 20/5 → 4*4 = 16
Because in pemdas, multiplicwtion and division are in equal order, so if theres only them left you just go from left to right

 â„–8040[Quote]

>>8037
>we go from left to right
no we don't retard, no wonder you got the common core answer

 â„–8045[Quote]


>>8040
Lets say you are right
Then in this case
20/5 (4)
20/5 is 20 over 5, so if you multiply you would get 80/5 = 16
Theres actually no way for this common engagement bait to ever equal to 1

 â„–8067[Quote]

>>8045
>Theres actually no way for this common engagement bait to ever equal to 1
yes there is, you do multiplication first then division. remember pemdas you don't mix and match, You start from the top and then work your way to the bottom.

 â„–8185[Quote]

>>8067
holy retard

 â„–8220[Quote]

>>8185
>t. commoncorelet

 â„–8259[Quote]

math is a psyop created by the CIA

 â„–8312[Quote]

>>8018 (OP)
>how can an equation in math have 2 possible solutions?
obviously this is a quadratic equation

 â„–8384[Quote]

File: cobson_math.png 📥︎ (23.76 KB, 888x810) ImgOps

Because in mathematics there are standards and the standard is that expressions are calculated from left to right.
If historically the standard were to solve expressions from right to left, in that world the answer 1 would be correct.

 â„–8401[Quote]

>>8384
Image defending common core math, couldn't be me. Also it doesn't matter which way you go the answer would still be 1

 â„–8402[Quote]

The answer is literally 16

 â„–8404[Quote]

>>8401
<common core is le bad because… is just is okay?
common core allows us to teach algebra extremely early on

 â„–8418[Quote]

>>8404
common core was made to make math harder and confusing for whites, the old way is better

 â„–8517[Quote]

>>8418
why are wypipo too retarded for common core

 â„–8557[Quote]

>>8018 (OP)
Because there are actually multiple standards for order of operations. Some European countries and physics textbooks use a slightly alternate order.
PEMDAS is not universal law. If we change how we write our equations then we can change how we read them to match, and it still works

 â„–8697[Quote]

>>8018 (OP)
<cannot into left-to-right associativity

almost every program on earth uses ltr associativity for evaluating operators, so there's no scenario where it's not 16. If you say 1, you're a nigger

 â„–8701[Quote]

How is it so many people don't know their order of operations? Christ

 â„–8717[Quote]

>>8697
says the one defending common core, plus you do multiplication first not division

 â„–8968[Quote]

Why is the projector wonky? Why is there raisin falling off the wall? How poor is this school?

 â„–8970[Quote]

File: 1743498470266l.png 📥︎ (60.17 KB, 819x597) ImgOps


 â„–8972[Quote]

>>8970
I was taught conventional parsing in the UK, which results in 16.

There is this thing called parse implicit multiplication first which I guess retarded Americans teach in schools just to use a non-standard idk really brap

 â„–8973[Quote]

>>8717
<common core is bad because… it just is okay??

 â„–9097[Quote]


 â„–9605[Quote]

>>9097
whitecuck cope

 â„–9630[Quote]

>>8018 (OP)
>how can an equation in math have 2 possible solutions?
This particular expression does not evaluate to 2 solutions. It is simply ambiguous notation that can be interpreted as 2 expressions with 2 solutions.
All other answers are wrong and everyone else is a faggot btw /thread

 â„–9882[Quote]

Wait, it's not PEDMAS?
This is probably why I struggled with maths. Fucking hell. Much use figuring that one out at 33.

 â„–9969[Quote]

>>9882
it is, only turd-worlders say other wise

 â„–9971[Quote]


 â„–9973[Quote]

order of operations is merely a social construct used to describe certain logical derivations

just like the rest of mathematics. tranny "science" tbqh

 â„–10115[Quote]

>>8404
literally was made for niggers who can't fallow instructions or formulas.

Literally the same bait as the "no child left behind" policy.

 â„–10207[Quote]

>>8040
>American
Holy raisin. No wonder you guys need H1B1 workforce
Put it inside a graphing calculator

 â„–10212[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20250423-070322.png 📥︎ (705.75 KB, 1080x2460) ImgOps


 â„–10517[Quote]

>>8018 (OP)
it's written ambiguously. you'd never have it like this ona test. it can be wholly avoided if written as a fraction so that you know where the parenthesis belongs.

 â„–10519[Quote]

>>9630
this

 â„–11176[Quote]

>>10115
so it should be easy for you whitecucks, no?



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / mtv / dem ] [ int / pol ] [ a / asp / biz / fit / k / r9k / sude / tech / tv / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]