β7039[Quote]
>>7037Present a rebuttal that is not a personal insult evading my paper, or fuck off
β7040[Quote]
>>7038Stop being childish and obtuse. You must be a professor of physics in denial.
Total fucking uncommunicative zombie.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
β7044[Quote]
>>7038If I take meds is it going to help you to open your mind?
Moron.
β7045[Quote]
>>7042There is absolutely nothing wrong with that and you are simply neglecting the evidence like a flat earth religious fanatic.
β7046[Quote]
>>7039It doesn't and you're coping.
β7047[Quote]
>>7046Please stop neglecting the evidence like a flat earther and stop childishly harassing me and address my paper.
β7048[Quote]
>>7045i don't know anything about science and i wasn't insulting you friendo, just saying if light had mass it would have been obvious to greeks thousands of years ago
β7050[Quote]
>>7048Sorry, but the evading of evidence is the behavior of a flat earther. Stop the appeal to tradition logical fallacy evasion and address my paper.
β7053[Quote]
Why are scientists unable to predict such a simple thing as a ball on a string which starts at 2rps and is reduced to 1/10th radius, when it is so reliable and repeatable?
β7056[Quote]
>>7054You are literally directly evading my paper, which is the evidence.
β7058[Quote]
>>7049Point out an error before claiming a made up one you lying piece of raisin.
Rebuttal 6 and 7 :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357302312_RebuttalsAddress my paper
β7061[Quote]
>>7060My references are clearly stated and they are βNewtonβs second law β and βnewtons law off gravitationβ are you telling me the you have difficulty understanding what these are and that you are confused about my proof because of that?
Just leave if you donβt know about the basic laws of Newton.
β7063[Quote]
>>7061>not peer reviewed>not worth anythingNo one cares
β7065[Quote]
>>7063The limit as we tend toward zero is irrelevant if zero itself is literally impossible.
Light cannot possibly have no mass because m=0 is impossible. What is so difficult here?
β7066[Quote]
>>7065Light has no mass, you're just coping. Light is a concept made up by our monkey minds to laughably try to understand what is actually happening.
β7068[Quote]
>>7066So you are literally claiming that we can set the mass to zero, despite the fact that divide by zero is not allowed because we have monkey minds. wtf??
β7071[Quote]
>>7060>muh peeeer revjeeewwhat a weak copout
β7074[Quote]
>>7060>>7054>>7038>>7049back to r/Mandlbaur you obsessed stalker
β7085[Quote]
>>7081Address my argument as presented and stop harassing me please?
β7097[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)Light may or may not have mass, but one can't conclude whether it does using math as math is merely a language used to describe things. Just like how we use English to say "niggers are ugly" - that statement, while true, does not by its utterance prove that niggers are ugly. In that specific case, the truth is self-evident; it is self-evident from actual observation in physical reality that niggers are ugly, so β therefore β the statement "niggers are ugly" contains truth. Unfortunately it's not nearly as easy to determine from actual observation in physical reality whether Light has mass or not. Saying something using the language of math to state that Light has mass, or that it does not have, does not prove anything. Math isn't science. Do not conflate the two.
β7139[Quote]
>light is composed entirely of photons, photons do not have any mass
Things that don't have mass don't exist. They cannot interact with reality. They cannot collide. No mass is just scientist/mathematician cope.
β7282[Quote]
You failed to explain why you are applying Newton's law of gravitation. What is your system? How is light related to gravity? What experimental evidence are you using to justify your hypothesis? There is no difference between your paper (which isn't peer reviewed) and me writing "m=0 therefore light has no mass".
β7285[Quote]
Please use proper typesetting, like word or LaTeX, or if you're schizo about using those programs use notepad or at least use a typewriter. I don't want to read your dimly lit cursive.
β7360[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)the fact that researchgate accepted this is insane
β7631[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)>prove that I'm retarded.yeah we're good.
β7664[Quote]
>>7657go on explain how I'm mad…
β7850[Quote]
>>7084<muh peer review is le evilmeds
β8156[Quote]
>>7282cope
β Eddington 1919 (and dozens of modern VLBI measurements): solar eclipse deflection of starlight β agrees with 4GM/(cΒ²b) to β²0.1%.
β PoundβRebka (1959): measured gravitational redshift ΞΞ½/Ξ½ = ΞΞ¦/cΒ² on Ξ³βrays β photons βweighβ just as m=E/cΒ² predicts.
β Shapiro delay, timeβdelay experiments (Cassini, VLBI), gravitational lensing surveys all confirm that light βfeelsβ gravity exactly as GR prescribes.
β8303[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)imagine being too retarded to typeset your paper in latex
β8987[Quote]
>>7097the fuck are you saying 'teen
β8992[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)having a raisinty handwriting doesn't entitle you to being right
β8998[Quote]
>>7040Always quick to point out the hatred, curiously silent as to why everyone espouses that hatred
Subversion is literally in your DNA
β9044[Quote]
>>9004
no way he's being serious
β9103[Quote]
>>7036 (OP)What does it say after "we can accept that"?
β9576[Quote]
>>9103it is irrelevant and therefore light can have no mass.what is overlooked is that if m is zero then we are dividing by zero, which is an unrealistic possibility. Conclusion: it is impossible for light to have zero mass
β9806[Quote]
>>9063how does he keep on doing this
β9870[Quote]
>If physics was correct then the hand held example would burn rubber because physics predicts 12000 rpm for this example :
Angular momentum is being conserved. Look at his arm shake. There are open questions in physics, but this example isn't one.
–
Radiation pressure is a real thing - seems to argue something about mass / conservation of momentum. Maybe look at that.
β9877[Quote]
Light has momentum, not mass
β10223[Quote]
>>9004
most keyed poster on /tech/ right now
β10967[Quote]
>>7042Photons being particles means they HAVE mass, and you are correct, until they mass enough badum tish. Lasers are a good example. You force a fuckton of photons into as small as possible a pathway and it burns a fucking hole through your chest using real life troll physics. That alone proves photons have mass, or that whatever light is if not photons does something that involves real, qualitative causal raisin in the world.