[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / mtv / dem ] [ int / pol ] [ a / asp / biz / fit / k / r9k / sude / tech / tv / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

/tech/ - Soyence and Technology

Download more RAM for your Mac here
Catalog

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (43.82 KB, 500x361) ImgOps

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 04:39:38 №11531 [Quote]

why don't Intel and AMD just remove ring 1 and ring 2 from the x86 architecture considering nobody even fucking uses them these days? are they retarded?

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 04:49:53 №11532 [Quote]

Are you stupid

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 04:51:06 №11533 [Quote]

>>11532
damn how did you know

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 12:51:42 №11558 [Quote]

>>11531 (OP)
Cuz it has nothing to do with them u stupid techilletrate cuntoid jeet

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 18:23:46 №11581 [Quote]

>>11558
well raisin if it has nothing to do with them then who the fuck is adding new instructions to the architecture

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 18:26:04 №11582 [Quote]

only nerds worry this much about computers

Chud 04/26/25 (Sat) 18:31:06 №11583 [Quote]

>>11582
nerds are the reason we have the funny woahjack website

Chud 04/27/25 (Sun) 05:42:23 №11611 [Quote]

>>11531 (OP)
They are probably depended upon by old programs, or new programs that only a few people use. They might be useful occasionally, and if it cost a lot of money to maintain chip designers would have put more of a priority on removing them. In general, if something isn't harmful it's probably better to keep it around rather than to try to remove it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton#Chesterton's_fence

[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]

Delete Post [ File] Password

Reason Urgent report

[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / mtv / dem ] [ int / pol ] [ a / asp / biz / fit / k / r9k / sude / tech / tv / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]