>>98083It's just not for you. Plain and simple.
The 1960s really weren't that innovative of a decade (in terms of music) outside of psychedelia, especially in comparison to the behemoth that is the 1970s, which had literally everything.
However, that's okay. I think the lack of extreme genre difference and defiance made it a very humble and comfortable decade for music, because the majority didn't have to show off, and it wasn't anything outwardly extreme or outlandish until the later half of the decade. (Roky Erickson, Syd Barrett, Arthur Brown, Tiny Tim, Walter Carlos, Frank Zappa, and Don Van Vliet)
Or exceptions from the earlier half of the decade (Moondog, Joe Meek, and The Monks.)
I personally, really enjoy the pop music from that period.
>>98299Of what decade? Be more specific. If you meant the 1960s, then I disagree; they would've had more impact on the 1970s, given that their debut was in January of 1969.
Cream, the Byrds, Creedence Clearwater Revival, Big Brother and the Holding Company, the Box Tops, the Grateful Dead, Procol Harum, Vanilla Fudge, Iron Butterfly, the Yardbirds, or even the fucking Monkees would've been more understandable picks.
And The Monkees were like the Big Time Rush of the 1960s.
<[egregious reddit space]If you meant the 1970s? Also disagree. They were based, but they weren't the only based band of that decade, and don't even get me fucking started.
>>98324I like every track on that album, but the self-titled always gets to me. It's so emotional. It's got that same feeling as listening to the Andrew Oldham rendition of "The Last Time."
Then you wanna cry when "Caroline, No" comes on right afterward.