/biz/ - Business Inquiries

Yeah those comments are chat gpt shill spam

I accidentally caused a raisinskin war with this post.

Who gives a fuck?
Let people be free to shill their raisinty raisincoin, if someone is so retarded to buy it their fault.

>>12630
The coins aren't the problem it's AI. I don't care when it's real people shilling. If a raisincoin has no organic discussion or buyers except victims then it's just a scam.

>>12569 (OP)
Air drops aren't real. Tall tale sign of rug pull
They should be in theory. Like if I release a new coin, it can only grow if it moves. It moves by exchanging hands. So naturally one has too be charitable.

However, they have no intention of organically trading the coin to be reputable. While that could secure it's overall value over time and even make it transcend rug pull worth, it's too easy to just pump and dump it. There's no real answer to it either other than
A: People just stop being short sighted coomers about investment.
Or B: They air drop more sparingly or control who they air drop too to someone they know will immediately trade with it. Which in a way is still conspiracy, but it's a lot different conspiring to vindicate than conspiring to topple a pyramid.

Like if I made a coin right now, gave you 50 of them, that's not enough to be a classic rug pull, it would just be a loose asset you could use on a whim and in time it legitimizes itself.

>>12641
I've been in coins where airdrops were real but their impact on price was minimal since it was already really high in mcap.
I think play to earn and controversially staking is not a traditional scam in the rugpull sense but it shifts the winners and losers to a different metagame.
Nuance is everything and there are ways to pull air drops off without taking liquidity away from holders and giving it to non-sellers. You don't even necessarily need to play the prisoner's dilemma with the airdrop recipients. You just need more liquidity coming in than going out.

>giving it to non-sellers
non holders*