№5578[Quote]
>>5574 (OP)9/10, cute colors, unfortunately would blind me in a millisecond
№5686[Quote]
i use pretty much stock sway dont need much more
№5711[Quote]
File: screen03.jpg 📥︎ (630.25 KB, 2560x1440) 3dde31ca322485bf2f518f30c94a1f21eebb38ccaf52627e13e6e559e22582460ImgOps
i'll post it here too then
№5821[Quote]
>inb4 that artix pedofag
kys pedo
№5839[Quote]
Gnome ftw, let me guess Fedora?
№5848[Quote]
>>5840Nailed it, I prefer the Ubuntu's gnome implementation, but Fedora is a very good distro
№5887[Quote]
raisinty FEDORA NIGGER prepare yourself and your internet to be drained during hour of insane updates
№6392[Quote]
>>5887Not that fedora nigger, but what the fuck are you talking about?
№6406[Quote]
>>6403Windowmaker is the goat THOUGH
№6411[Quote]
>>6406looks nice but it's X11 maybe ill consider
№6414[Quote]
>>6411I determined windowmaker is THE best DE during my linux years, its worth a shout
Whats wrong with X11? Its never caused me any trouble
№6419[Quote]
>>6414le wayland LE GOOD or something
also because wayland has a ton more support now as everybody ditches X11
№6422[Quote]
>>6419My iMac runs X11 and runs all the software with 0 issues at all, I dont get the fuss about X11 vs wayland
Linux devs should stop focusing over that small useless raisin and make a DE that can beat windowmaker in usability and speed atp
№6424[Quote]
>>6420Gnome gets uglier and uglier every time I see a screen shot of it throughout the years
№6425[Quote]
>>6422possible trvke but i dont know how easy windowmaker will be to setup for me
№6427[Quote]
>>6425"sudo apt install wmaker"
then logout and select it
№6428[Quote]
>>6427jokes on you i use an even more annoying distro
but looks like im going to try gnome first
№6433[Quote]
>>>5574 (OP)
Love those green colors. The default KDE blue hue is alright, but that one is much better.
№6435[Quote]
>>6430Oh, rip
Gnome isnt my thing, its bootleg chromeos minus the performance and stability
Wmaker shaves off 500 megabytes of ram usage compared to gnome in my experience, potentially far more thanks to alternatives like PCmanFM over Nautilus and stuff
№6437[Quote]
>>6424I'm using an extension to make it look like an older version, if you saw how gnome 4 actually looks you'd probably hate it even more kek
№6444[Quote]
>>6438>tuxler>4 browsers pinned to taskbaror something
№6445[Quote]
>>6444tuxler lets me have different residential ips between browsers so i keep it only for that reason
№6446[Quote]
>>6438Its not just muh pretty, EVERY bit of software that looks like chromeos 2020's garbage also runs like garbage
My hardware is pretty raisin so I cant afford to have gnome helping itself to all of my ram and single core just for it to navigate me to my programs worse than windowmaker
№6447[Quote]
>>6445fyi it makes you a residential ip for someone else too
№6448[Quote]
>>6447not if you turn off autostart for it and shut down the program when you're not using it
i know it's a botnet so i use mysterium nowadays but sometimes mysterium breaks or i need multiple resis and i boot it up
№6458[Quote]
>>6453paid residential proxy provider
if you look at my desktop it's right under tuxler
№6685[Quote]
>>6445Can't you get falsely implicated if you have to same IP as someone who's downloading 'p?
№7101[Quote]
File: file.png 📥︎ (1.66 MB, 1920x1080) 3c868f338b86c233e0c66c7324b30e3389378ed9b4dbe0cbb6c302876bbc37cc0ImgOps
№9600[Quote]
bump, need more gemtops
№9624[Quote]
>>9600Slow day at the NSA?
№9639[Quote]
>>6679What music application is that?
№9734[Quote]
>>9624not glowing today unforch
№9770[Quote]
>>6763music player? doesn't look like cmus>>6763
№9779[Quote]
>>6445>caring this much about your ip>on windows Jfl
№10149[Quote]
>>6679nice font whats the name?
№10280[Quote]
File: raisin.png 📥︎ (1019.48 KB, 1920x1080) 7869f7d9f02af933922acccc24c8df8c31337333712320f3c09f2ccd667b30330ImgOps
This is my laptop I use for college
№10318[Quote]
>>>5574 (OP)
How usable is a core2duo in 2025 fellow thinkpad enjoyer?
№10322[Quote]
>>10318i can do everything other than AAA gaming, heavy 3d modeling in blender, or 4K video editing (4K video still plays fine at 24Hz in mpv)
things take longer to compile, but that doesn't bother me because i can just give it a very low priority to avoid lag while i do work, or i leave my thinkpad running over night and it will be done compiling by the time i wake up
ironically the modern web gobbles up more resources than a lot of video games, HOW THE FUCK do you manage to consume 95% of my cpu resources rendering a fucking rounded button in JS at 30fps, while i can play amazing games like quake 3 at the highest settings in 800x600@80Hz?
№10323[Quote]
>>10322This thing called frameworks built apon frameworks, it's retarded
№10324[Quote]
>>6438>pretty desktops bad o algo>uses Win11 (XAML taskbar)geg
№10327[Quote]
>>10323what the fuck is a "framework"?
JS is already bad enough, even CSS is pretty bloated (although i use some on my site to make it look different than #000000 on #FFFFFF), but literally who the fuck is incompetent enough to not write web pages manually?
btw can you tell me if i'm the only one, or does this CSS cause lag?
.glow {
color: #fff;
text-align: center;
-webkit-animation: glow 2s ease-in-out infinite alternate;
-moz-animation: glow 2s ease-in-out infinite alternate;
animation: glow 2s ease-in-out infinite alternate;
}
@-webkit-keyframes glow {
from {
text-shadow: 0 0 20px #fff, 0 0 30px #fff, 0 0 40px #00ff00, 0 0 50px #00ee00, 0 0 60px #00dd00, 0 0 70px #00cc00, 0 0 80px #00bb00;
}
to {
text-shadow: 0 0 5px #fff, 0 0 10px #00aa0a, 0 0 15px, 0 0 20px #009900, 0 0 25px #008800, 0 0 30px #007700, 0 0 35px #006600;
}
}
(
https://cia.govt.hu/ if you are too lazy)
№10329[Quote]
>>10327>What the fuck is a "framework"https://react.dev/It's as niggerlicious as you think
>css animationsCSS animations tend to be unoptimized on browsers I think cause the browser doesn't compile to hardware accelerated shaders like native toolkit animations on GTK/Qt/Win32/Cocoa do. It uses like 60% of Top on my Unix box but that's 5% CPU measuring on the whole chip. But Sharty idles at near 0 CPU impact doe
№10335[Quote]
>>10322Yeah I was mainly concerned about internet usage, I know that if one stays within ones means even a 20 year old machine can be usable. But the modern internet bogs down even my thinkpad x230 with the i5 which is the main reason I switched to a more modern machine. (I'm the guy with the LOQ 15APH8 a few posts above).
№10338[Quote]
>>10329>hardware accelerateddo you really think i have hardware acceleration, in a web browser?
i don't even have hardware acceleration for video decoding other than mpeg2 lmao
how do i fix this without resorting to a niggerlicious JS hack?
and WHAT THE FUCK is react?
>>10335web browsers are supposed to render html, not be fucking virtual machines for spaghetti code written in a joke language that was designed in 10 days to troll people.
№10348[Quote]
>>10338>how do i fix this without resorting to a niggerlicious JS hack?You block some theme animations or something, browsers on modern devices use OpenGL to render some elements but I think it's highly unoptimized, especially for CSS animations
№10351[Quote]
>>10348no i mean how do i fix this animation to prevent it from causing lag, i still want my glowie animation to work.
№10352[Quote]
>>10351ya don't because browsers suck, doe it doesn't lag on my device, just use a bit more resources, my device is extremely EXTREMELY overpowered
№10355[Quote]
>>10352weirdly enough it doesn't lag for me if i use LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1, so perhaps i DO have some hardware acceleration (openGL)?
i wonder how i can force-disable GL rendering (not fall back to software gl, but use webkit's software rendering) in webkit
it also only lags when i unfocus the site
№10357[Quote]
>>10355>webkitoh that's why it's lagging
I opened it in Chromium and it werked just fine, just used a little CPU
WebKit is an autistic nigger, that explains why it's only lagging when you unfocus because it's really anal about using power and lags on purpose sometimes
№10366[Quote]
>>10357what other option is there, chromium is literal malware, firefuck is unusable garbage, and ladybird barely even compiles right now, anything else will not work with 90% of all "modern" websites (partially thanks to cuckflare's niggerlicious bullraisin malicious fingerprinting JS captchas)
№10367[Quote]
>>10366WebKit is literal apple iMalware doe
№10370[Quote]
>>10367even though there is zero spyware in it, zero web requests made without me explicitly asking it to, and all the source code is free
i'm really waiting for ladybird, please don't disappoint me andreas kling
№10400[Quote]
>>10370Same with firefox except firefox bothers to listen to web standards while Apple is known as the problem browser like IE used to be
№10402[Quote]
WebKit also doesn't use Manifest V2 for extensions it uses some proprietary Apple schizophrenia unless you use some fork like Orion
№10404[Quote]
>>10400i like being part of the last bastion that keeps soydevs at bay.
>proprietary apple schizophreniawhat extensions?
you mean .so files symlinked into /usr/lib/surf/ ?
its not proprietary, take a look at wyebadblock if you want to figure out how it works.
№10415[Quote]
>>10404Apple and the BSDtards are LITERALLY where soydevs start geg, every other suckless dwm user is a certified tranny faggot with OneShot on every device and a collection of troonslop art in ~/Photos, BSD is from San Francisco
№10418[Quote]
>>10404>loading random .so files into your programs Better hope you have a good grasp of reading source code for security issues.
№10422[Quote]
>>10418>wah wah you can't just let extensions have full access to your entire web browser!!sandboxing is a meme, of course i read source code before compiling or running raisin, i'm not insane.
№10425[Quote]
>>10422Reading ≠ comprehending. Did you test to make sure they don't have hanging RCEs? Or did you just stare at it a bit and then pointed your compiler to it.
№10429[Quote]
>>10425there is nothing fishy in it, all wyebadblock does is block specific elements on web pages, listed in a text file.
№10432[Quote]
>>10429Not about fishy, it's about exploitability. If you don't actually know that it's not exploitable, then you're just coping
№10433[Quote]
>>10432its very unlikely that it is, if anything webkit has a 20000 times higher chance of being vulnerable or exploitable
№10435[Quote]
>>10433Trve, but you need to be sure if you're gonna literally reject sandboxing
Also
https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/apple-releases-patch-for-webkit-zero.html>but that's iMalwareYEAH AND FUCKING WEBKIT IS APPLE, SURF IS DOWNSTREAM FROM SAFARI.